Being a trauma survivor’s partner: a precious and delicate role

How to love someone who carries invisible wounds? Is there an optimal way to be the partner of someone who has survived interpersonal trauma? 

When we are in an intimate relationship with someone who has been hurt in a relationship context, we can feel both invested and powerless in the face of our partner’s trauma history and of the challenges that come with it (for example, difficulty with trust, intimacy, communication). This article explores the precious and delicate role of the partners of people who have experienced interpersonal trauma. With the right tools, a conscientious, well-intentioned and secure partner can play a major role and help create a space for healing. 

Understanding interpersonal trauma and its repercussions on intimate relationships 

These consequences may, among other things, affect the survivor's perception of their partner and their relationship10. Studies show that the more severe the traumas experienced, the less likely survivors are to perceive their partner as supportive and understanding10. They are often more sensitive to rejection, more distrustful and find it harder to believe that others are acting with benevolence8, 11. This remains true even when it is not objectively the case. These perceptions have a purpose: having experienced betrayal, abandonment, invalidation by significant people, survivors may develop defense mechanisms to help protect them from future hurt12, such as psychological strategies (e.g., distrust, retreat) that were adopted unconsciously to avoid getting hurt again. These defense mechanisms developed as adaptive responses to threatening or unpredictable relational contexts, but today they can have harmful effects on the quality of intimate relationships. These defense mechanisms are often deeply rooted12. This is why, in the context of an intimate relationship, it may be difficult for survivors to perceive their partner as someone who is reliable, loving and secure. 

The partner’s role in post-traumatic recovery

For most adults, intimate partners play a central role and provide a refuge from the trials of everyday life13. In interpersonal trauma survivors, a healthy intimate relationship can also help with post-traumatic recovery and offer a context where past wounds can heal13. A healthy intimate relationship can facilitate a gradual detachment from defenses developed in traumatic contexts, provide a space to explore new relationship dynamics and promote positive representations of oneself (e.g., seeing oneself as worthy of respect and love) and of others (e.g., perceiving others as benevolent)13.  Trauma survivors’ partners have the power to provide a space where their partner can, at their own pace, relearn to trust and be open to others. The survivor can thus build a meaningful relationship that is less frightening, where intimacy and interdependence seem possible and safe. 

Being a secure partner: a few concrete guidelines 

Being a secure partner means offering a stable, predictable, and supportive relationship. To this end, here are some examples of factors that can promote post-traumatic recovery:

• Emotional validation14,15 consists of recognizing what the other is feeling, without minimizing, correcting or analyzing their emotions. For example, saying "I understand that you’re feeling this way" or  "it is okay to feel this way" validates emotions as they are, rather than dismissing them with remarks such as “it doesn’t matter” or “you’re exaggerating.” Validating is not solving a problem; it is acknowledging the experience as it is, without judging or denying it.

• Clear and benevolent communication14 is based on honestly expressing what you think, feel, and expect, while creating a safe space for the other person to do the same (e.g., asserting your needs respectfully and inviting the other person to do the same). Unspoken words, insinuations, or ambiguities can fuel insecurity. Conversely, clear and respectful communication reinforces the feeling of being heard and valued.

• Stability14 manifests itself in consistency in behavior, responses, and daily presence. Sudden changes or inconsistent reactions can reignite insecurity. Being consistent, giving advance warning of changes, and keeping commitments are actions that help maintain a reassuring atmosphere.

• Relationship safety15 develops over time, through repeated interactions where the person feels free to be themselves and to be vulnerable, without fear of being judged, rejected, or abandoned. It involves not reproducing dynamics of control, invalidation, or rejection. By being attentive and sensitive to the feelings of one another, we can adjust our behavior to promote a safe environment.

• Respect15 involves genuinely considering the other person's boundaries at all levels. This means, for example, offering closeness without ever imposing it, and accepting moments of silence or withdrawal without interpreting them as a problem (e.g., as rejection). Recognizing that the other person has their own needs, rhythms, and preferences, even if they differ from ours, is a sign of respect.

• Patience is essential, because the path to post-traumatic healing is not linear. It can be punctuated by detours, doubts, or moments of withdrawal. Accepting this pace, without pressure or expectations of visible progress, is what constitutes genuine support. Patience, in this case, is not passive waiting, but an active presence that gives the other person the time and space to rebuild themselves.

• Autonomy15,16 means being available without being intrusive, supporting without directing. Most survivors have experienced situations where their autonomy has been compromised. It is essential to give them back the power to make their own choices, set their own boundaries, and follow their own path. It is important to recognize and emphasize their ability to move forward on their own. 

To conclude 

Being in a relationship with someone who has survived interpersonal trauma requires special attention, an awareness of relationship issues, and an attitude marked by respect, kindness, and consistency. This role can be delicate and come with many challenges, but it is also deeply meaningful.

This role obviously has its limits. It is not about taking over or replacing therapeutic support. However, a romantic partner has the potential to be healing. Ultimately, being a secure partner does not mean being free from mistakes or personal needs. Missteps and conflicts occur in all relationships, no matter how healthy they may be. Rather, it is about cultivating a relationship marked by mutual kindness, where we can both recognize each other's needs and remain attentive to our own limits. Showing compassion towards ourselves is as fundamental as showing it towards our partner. 

To learn more about the effects of interpersonal trauma on intimate relationships:

My past wounds complicate my romantic relationship (blog article)

Traumas interpersonnels vécus en enfance et relations de couple (science communication text)

Traumas interpersonnels en enfance et satisfaction conjugale (infographics)

Van der Kolk, B. A. (2014). The body keeps the score: Brain, mind, and body in the healing of trauma. Viking.

• 1

  Herman, J. L. (1992). Trauma and recovery: The aftermath of violence—from domestic abuse to political terror. Basic Books.

• 1

  Bigras, N., Daspe, M.-È., Godbout, N., Briere, J., & Sabourin, S. (2017). Cumulative childhood trauma and adult sexual satisfaction: Mediation by affect dysregulation and sexual anxiety in men and women. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 43(4), 377‑396. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2016.1176609 

• 2

  Organisation Mondiale de la Santé. (2014). Global status report on violence prevention. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241564793 

• 3

  Freyd, J. J. (1996). Betrayal trauma: The logic of forgetting childhood abuse. Harvard University Press.

• 4

  Briere, J. (2002). Treating adult survivors of severe childhood abuse and neglect: Further development of an integrative model. In J.E.B. Myers, L. Berliner, J. Briere, C.T. Hendrix, T. Reid & C. Jenny, The APSAC Handbook on Child Maltreatment (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

• 5

  Godbout, N., Runtz, M., MacIntosh, H. B., & Briere, J. (2013). Traumas interpersonnels vécus en enfance et relations de couple. Cahiers de la Recherche/Science & Pratique, 3(2), 14–17. 

• 6

  DiLillo, D., Peugh, J., Walsh, K., Panuzio, J., Trask, E., & Evans, S. (2009). Child maltreatment history among newlywed couples: A longitudinal study of marital outcomes and mediating pathways. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77(4), 680–692. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015708

• 7

  Dugal, C., Godbout, N., Bélanger, C., Hébert, M., & Goulet, M. (2018). Cumulative childhood maltreatment and subsequent psychological violence in intimate relationships: The role of emotion dysregulation. Partner Abuse, 9(1), 18–40. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.9.1.18 

• 8a8b

  Godbout, N., Dutton, D. G., Lussier, Y., & Sabourin, S. (2009). Early exposure to violence, domestic violence, attachment representations, and marital adjustment. Personal Relationships, 16(3), 365–384. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14756811.2009.01228

• 10a10b

  Vaillancourt-Morel, M.-P., Rellini, A. H., Godbout, N., Sabourin, S., & Bergeron, S. (2019). Intimacy mediates the relation between maltreatment in childhood and sexual and relationship satisfaction in adulthood: A dyadic longitudinal analysis. Archives of Sexual, 48(3), 803–814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1309-1

• 11

  Luterek, J. A., Harb, G. C., Heimberg, R. G., & Marx, B. P. (2004). Interpersonal rejection sensitivity in childhood sexual abuse survivors: Mediator of depressive symptoms and anger suppression. Interpersonal Violence, 19, 90–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862 60503259052.

• 12a12b

  Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. Guilford Press.

• 13a13b13c

  Godbout, N., Bigras, N., Runtz, M., & Briere, J. (2017). Traumas dans l’enfance et les relations de couple.  In Y. Lussier, S. Sabourin & C. Bélanger, Fondements de la psychologie du couple. Presses de l’Université du Québec.

• 14a14b14c

  Johnson, S. M. (2004). The practice of emotionally focused couple therapy: Creating connection (2nd ed.). Brunner-Routledge.

• 15a15b15c15d

  Ford, J. D., & Courtois, C. A. (2013). Treating complex traumatic stress disorders in adults: Scientific foundations and therapeutic models. Guilford Press.

• 16

  Briere, J., & Scott, C. (2015). Principles of trauma therapy: A guide to symptoms, evaluation, and treatment (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.